At a glance
- Six tools built on one private intake.
- Intake, plans, lab values, and journal stay in the employee's browser.
- Employers do not receive individual reports.
- Deterministic rules engine — no language model improvising on health.
- Open source under Apache 2.0; auditable by your DPO and medical advisor.
What employees get
Most wellbeing benefits offer one thing — an app, a hotline, a portal. Almavivo covers six concrete jobs an employee runs into during a working year, all built on one shared intake.
- Personal supplement plan. From the intake: tiered plan with dose, timing, evaluation window, and safety guards. Lifestyle anchors first, supplements last.
- Annual physical prep sheet. Personalised questions to ask their GP, screenings to track, and any urgent symptoms to mention first. Anchored to USPSTF, NHS, ATA, ADA.
- Medication review prep. A clean list of every prescription, OTC product, and supplement, with sourced questions for a pharmacist or GP medication review. Not an interaction checker, not a dose calculator.
- Lab values in context. About 20 common markers placed against sex/age-aware reference bands with context from the intake. Educational only — the employee's own lab and clinician remain authoritative.
- Shift-work circadian plan. Light, anchor sleep, caffeine, meal timing for fixed-night and forward-rotating shifts, with a wallet-sized print card. Useful for security, IT on-call, facilities, healthcare-adjacent staff.
- Household profiles. An employee can keep separate profiles on the same device for adult household members, with consent. Profiles are independent and stay on-device.
See the full tool index →
Why it lands where others stalled
Industry-average completion on health-assessment-style platforms sits around 22%. Employees suspect their answers may be visible to management or exposed in a breach, so they answer cautiously or not at all. Almavivo removes that friction by design — the most sensitive answers don’t need to leave the device.
- Higher-trust adoption in confidentiality-sensitive cohorts (legal, finance, consulting, leadership).
- Useful at the level employees care about — sleep, energy, stress, supplement safety — not dashboards.
- No central store of employee health answers to leak, subpoena, or breach.
Household value, not a family health record
An employee can keep separate profiles on the same device for adult household members — a partner, an adult child, a parent they’re helping — each with their consent and on a personal device. Profiles are independent and stay on-device. Almavivo and the employer don’t receive dependant data. For under-18s, the supplement engine routes to a paediatrician.
What employers see, and what they don’t
| An employer can receive | An employer does not receive |
|---|
- Seat allocation.
- Aggregate, anonymous activation and completion counts at cohort level — only if separately agreed.
| - Individual employees' answers, symptoms, or plans.
- Named employee health profiles.
- Any silent stream of personal answers from employees to the employer.
|
Cohort reporting beyond seat allocation is a separate, agreed capability — not a default. Where it’s enabled, your normal employment and data-protection obligations apply.
Best fit
- 150–1,500 staff: law, finance, consulting, accounting, architecture, engineering, SaaS.
- Confidentiality-sensitive cohorts and senior leadership groups.
- Founder-led firms introducing structured wellbeing for the first time.
- Firms whose existing wellness platform isn't landing.
Auditable by your DPO and medical advisor
Every question, supplement rule, excluded item, and safety guard is published openly under Apache 2.0. Your medical advisor reviews the rules. Your DPO reviews the data flow. Your security team reads the source. Nothing on trust.
github.com/almavivo/open-health-enginemethodologywhat we excludeprivacy architecture
Start with a controlled pilot
12 weeks, 50–100 seats, full premium tier free at point of use for every covered employee. Pilot pricing for the first few firms in each segment. Both sides decide at week 12 whether to expand.
Email [email protected] with rough team size, target start month, and the primary concern you want the pilot to address.
FAQ
Do you store employee health answers?
No. Intake answers, lab values, plans, ratings, and favourites live only in the employee's browser. They are not transmitted to our servers during normal use.
Can managers see individual reports?
No. Employers do not receive individual reports. We do not maintain a server-side employee health record an employer can inspect.
What if an employee chooses to share their plan with HR or a wellbeing lead?
Only if the employee initiates it. The share path composes a message in the employee's browser and hands it to their own mail client. There is no admin-side ingest.
Is this a replacement for clinical care?
No. Almavivo is an educational tool. Red-flag symptoms are routed toward clinical review.
How is this different from a wellness survey?
A survey collects answers into a database. Almavivo doesn't. The intake stays on the device, the recommendation runs on the device.
Do you use AI to generate recommendations?
No. A deterministic rules engine produces recommendations. A language model never generates supplement decisions.
Are dependants covered?
Yes — an employee can keep separate profiles on the same device for adult household members, with consent, on a personal device. Profiles are independent. For under-18s, the supplement engine routes to a paediatrician.
Will this conflict with our existing EAP, occupational health, or PMI?
No. Almavivo complements, not replaces. The prep sheet routes employees toward their existing GP/PMI relationship.
What about UK GDPR, EU GDPR, or Australian Privacy Act obligations?
Intake answers are not transmitted to our servers during normal use, so no central duty arises for them. Anything you separately agree (seat lists, activation counts, cohort reporting) is within your normal employment-and-privacy obligations. Your DPO or legal counsel should be involved in defining cohort data and lawful basis.
Is the medication review prep tool a regulated medical device?
We've designed it not to be. It does record-keeping and question-generation only. It does not calculate doses, check interactions, or output a clinical recommendation. The boundary rationale is documented internally and shareable under NDA.